Victor Crivoi vs Uladzimir Ignatik Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W W W W L L
Form
L W W L W L W L W LH2H: Crivoi 1 - 1 Ignatik
They have played 5 sets in total, with Crivoi winning 2 and Ignatik winning 3. The last match between Crivoi and Ignatik was at the Arad Challenger, 04-06-2014, First, Clay with Uladzimir Ignatik getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Victor Crivoi | 1 |
| Uladzimir Ignatik | 1 |
Arad Challenger(04-06-2014)
6
4
6
4
| Crivoi | Stats | Ignatik |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 75 | Highest Rank | 129 |
| 42 | Age | 34 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 26 | Titles | 23 |
| 64% (478-273) | Career Total W/L | 57% (537-402) |
| $168,915 | Career Prize Money | $205,460 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Keys VS Kalinskaya PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Masarova VS Stearns PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Uladzimir Ignatik
Player
Victor Crivoi
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
| 3-6 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Victor Crivoi
Player
Uladzimir Ignatik
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
3
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
6
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 23 | Games Won | 24 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 13 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 12 |
| 1:45:52 | Average Match Time | 1:45:52 |
| 62% (85/138) | 1st Serve % | 64% (94/148) |
| 58% (49/85) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (60/94) |
| 49% (26/53) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (20/54) |
| 41% (9/22) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 59% (10/17) |
| 46% (68/148) | Return Points Win % | 46% (63/138) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Victor Crivoi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolae Frunza
Player
Victor Crivoi
56%
(
53 of
94)
1st Serve %
64%
(
62 of
97)
1
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
4
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
37%
(
35 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(6) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Victor Crivoi
Player
Kirill Kivattsev
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
36 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victor Crivoi
Player
Vladimir Filip
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
10
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
Player
Victor Crivoi
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
67
Total Points Won
66
|
5-7 5-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 0-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Uladzimir Ignatik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Moez Echargui
Player
Uladzimir Ignatik
51%
(
43 of
84)
1st Serve %
52%
(
41 of
79)
1
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
100%
(
8 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
92
Total Points Won
71
|
5-7 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Uladzimir Ignatik
Player
Umut Akkoyun
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
50%
(
18 of
36)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
51
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Felix Gill
Player
Uladzimir Ignatik
64%
(
57 of
89)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
86
|
1-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Uladzimir Ignatik
Player
Calin Manda
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
10
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
97%
(
33 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
15 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
88)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yan Bondarevskiy
Player
Uladzimir Ignatik
65%
(
68 of
104)
1st Serve %
59%
(
69 of
117)
3
Aces
16
6
Double Faults
4
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
39%
(
41 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
56 of
117)
119
Total Points Won
102
|
6-2 6-7(8) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Uladzimir Ignatik
Player
Lior Goldenberg
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
11
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lukas Rosol
Player
Uladzimir Ignatik
64%
(
65 of
102)
1st Serve %
51%
(
51 of
100)
6
Aces
12
6
Double Faults
4
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
40 of
51)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
100)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Uladzimir Ignatik
Player
Hanyi Liu
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
92%
(
12 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Uladzimir Ignatik
Player
Chien-Hsun Lo
33%
(
4 of
12)
1st Serve %
80%
(
12 of
15)
2
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
1 of
12)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
20
Total Points Won
7
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jiri Lehecka
Player
Uladzimir Ignatik
62%
(
63 of
101)
1st Serve %
58%
(
76 of
130)
10
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
51 of
76)
71%
(
27 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
26 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
49 of
130)
124
Total Points Won
107
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (478/273) | Win/Loss | 57% (537/402) |
| 61% (1043/673) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (1267/975) |
| 54% (8513/7258) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (11471/10289) |
| 28% (5/13) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (150/108) |
| 66% (452/230) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (226/169) |
| 47% (20/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (157/118) |
| 13% (1/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.4 |
| 719 | Aces Total | 4285 |
| 0.06 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 494 | Total Double Faults | 1971 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:2:9 |
| 597.91 | Average Opponent Rank | 597.28 |
| 63% (10761/16957) | 1st Serve % | 62% (27022/43535) |
| 66% (7059/10761) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (19800/27022) |
| 49% (3020/6196) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (7871/16513) |
| 44% (731/1662) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (1633/4042) |
| 40% (6560/16551) | Return Points Win % | 38% (16784/44289) |
| 37% (11/19) | Slam W/L | 35% (14/26) |
| 75% (3/1) | Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 30% (3/7) | Cups W/L | 44% (12/15) |
| 50% (45/45) | Main Tour W/L | 26% (5/14) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (169/128) | Challenger W/L | 50% (256/257) |
| 77% (247/73) | Futures W/L | 74% (249/88) |
| 65% (465/719) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (516/901) |
| 36% (5/14) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 46% (13/28) |
| 54% (97/179) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (188/393) |
| 59% (128/217) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (157/338) |
| 89% (452/401) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 79% (581/458) |
| 11% (452/50) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 21% (581/122) |
| 27% (298/79) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (358/78) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
